Abstract
In many instances when using the BF method, we do not have an external source for the expected loss costs. In this situation, we will frequently use a weighted average of
ultimate loss costs of the preceding accident periods. The Cape Cod method suggests using weights proportional to exposure and inversely proportional to development.
Unfortunately, this approach fails to recognize variability in both the historical loss estimates and loss development factors. This paper attempts to recognize this variability, via credibility formula, and apply the results as alternative weights to the traditional Cape
Cod method.
KEYWORDS: Trend, Credibility, Loss Development
KEYWORDS: Trend, Credibility, Loss Development
Volume
37
Year
2007
Categories
Actuarial Applications and Methodologies
Ratemaking
Trend and Loss Development
Financial and Statistical Methods
Credibility
Publications
ASTIN Colloquium
Documents