Jean-Pierre
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Chabarek <paulchabarek@worldnet.att.net>
To: Paul Klauke/CorpCentre/GB/GRE-Group at GRE-GROUP KLAUKE01 - GBGRE002
<paul_klauke@gre-group.e-mail.com> studygroup9@lists.casact.org
<studygroup9@lists.casact.org>
Date: July 23, 1998 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: NCCI Experience Rating - Missing Pages?
>Paul: I too am missing pages 13-14 from NCCI's ERP which was part of the
>Study Kit provided by the CAS. I do note that the last word for this
>source's mention in the Syllabus says, "Excerpt," so it MIGHT be a good
>presumption that we are not responsible for pp. 13-14. It probably would be
>better if the Syllabus had identified specific pages as is done for most
>other required readings (presuming I'm correct and the missing pages are
>not some oversight). This would make for a good recommendation to the CAS.
>In comparing the Study Kit version against my company's in house version, I
>do note that the Study Kit also lacks pages A-17 through A-21, which are
>"Schedule Rating Worksheets" for 5 individual states, similar to the one
>for AZ on p. A-15, also apparently not required reading. Re your 2nd
>question, I'll presume when you wrote "section 4" that you meant "Part
>Four" and tell you this - in my company's version, there is a page
>preceding the page headed, "INTERSTATE RATING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATIVE
>PROCEDURES FOR INTERSTATE EXPERIENCE RATING," that's headed, "NOTICE TO
>EXPERIENCE PLAN MANUAL HOLDERS". There are 2 paragraphs on this page, the
>second of which gives a technical assistance reference. The first paragraph
>reads: "Enclosed are updated administrative procedures for Interstate
>Experience Rating which may be useful in better understanding the
>Interstate Rating process. As a handy reference, this supplement may be
>inserted in your Experience Rating Plan Manual." Based on this, my guess is
>that this is not "old poop" but helpful info that the CAS feels would help
>and thus is required, and perhaps not technically considered an official
>part of the ERP Manual (perhaps because not reviewed nor approved by the
>appropriate regulatory bodies). Again, specific page references in the
>Syllabus would clarify, and your call to Arlington should eliminate any
>confusion. It would have helped had the CAS included the "NOTICE" page and
>further ambiguity has been created because NCCI's Table Of Contents does
>not appear to be up to date. Hope this helps.
>
>Paul Chabarek
>
>----------
>> From: Paul Klauke/CorpCentre/GB/GRE-Group at GRE-GROUP KLAUKE01 -
>GBGRE002 <paul_klauke@gre-group.e-mail.com>
>> To: studygroup9@lists.casact.org
>> Subject: NCCI Experience Rating - Missing Pages?
>> Date: Thursday, July 23, 1998 6:44 AM
>>
>>
>===========================================================================
=
>===
>>
>>
>> Guardian Royal Exchange Services ltd
>> Corporate Centre
>> Royal Exchange
>>
>> From Paul Klauke Internal tel 723 5624
>> Actuary Direct tel +44 (0) 171 454 5624
>> on 23/07/98 11:33 Direct fax +44 (0) 171 696 5336
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> The table of contents for the NCCI Experience Rating Plan Manual
>> mentions a Supplement section, pages 13-14. These pages don't seem
>> to have been included in my Study Kit Update I received from the CAS.
>>
>> I did receive, however, an apparently "extra" section called
>> "Interstate Rating" dated 1/1/88 (6 pages text with exhibits A-C).
>>
>> Two questions:
>>
>> (1) Is the Interstate Rating section "old poop" that has been
>> replaced by section 4?
>>
>> (2) Is anyone else missing pages 13 and 14?
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> P.S. After a long hiatus from the exam grind, I'm a first timer
>> having trouble getting out of the blocks (just finished readings for
>> week 1). I'm based in London so don't have much interaction with CAS
>> folk. This study group should help. Thanks!
>