Re: This Group

Paul Chabarek ( (no email) )
Wed, 8 Jul 1998 17:35:06 -0400

Within the "Retro Rating" topic, NEAS order "bats" Lee second, right after
Gillam & Snader Part II. Paul

----------
> From: Lawn,Yin <Yin.Lawn@cna.com>
> To: studygroup9@lists.casact.org
> Subject: Re: This Group
> Date: Wednesday, July 08, 1998 4:34 PM
>
> For the most part, the order in the syllabus is fine. However, I think
> you should read Lee's paper on "graphic" approach before you read
> anything else regarding excess premium, insurance charge or table L.
>
> ---Yin
> ----------
> From: meyer.shields@zurich.com
> To: studygroup9@lists.casact.org
> Subject: Re: This Group
> Date: Wednesday, July 08, 1998 2:40PM
>
> I am taking Part 9 for the first time. I was wondering whether there is
> an
> order to go through the articles that is better than the order found in
> the
> syllabus itself.
>
> Also, the Murdza manual questions seem to imply that there have been
> very
> few questions on the formulas in Venter's review of Brown's paper (i.e.
> the
> first one on the syllabus). Does that seem reasonable ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Meyer
>