------=_NextPart_000_009E_01BDAA8B.FDB64980
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Questions don't have to be from the equations. There are a few lists =
that you can make from that paper that could come in a question
-----Original Message-----
From: Mercier, Mark F. <MERM235@LNI.WA.GOV>
To: 'Jean-Pierre Gagnon' <jpgagnon@allstate.ca>
Date: July 8, 1998 4:06 PM
Subject: RE: This Group
I doubt Venter's discussion will ever be that critical. The equations =
are difficult to memorize and don't necessarily add a lot of value with =
the increase in complexity.
-----Original Message-----=20
From: Jean-Pierre Gagnon [SMTP:jpgagnon@allstate.ca]=20
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 1998 1:01 PM=20
To: studygroup9@lists.casact.org=20
Subject: Re: This Group=20
=20
I read the article in the order of the syllabus, and it suited me =
fine. As=20
far as Venter, it's true that there has not been a lot of questions =
on it.=20
You'd think that it should come soon, right?=20
=20
Jean-Pierre=20
-----Original Message-----=20
From: meyer.shields@zurich.com <meyer.shields@zurich.com>=20
To: studygroup9@lists.casact.org <studygroup9@lists.casact.org>=20
Date: July 8, 1998 3:45 PM=20
Subject: Re: This Group=20
=20
=20
I am taking Part 9 for the first time. I was wondering whether =
there is an=20
order to go through the articles that is better than the order found =
in the=20
syllabus itself.=20
=20
Also, the Murdza manual questions seem to imply that there have been =
very=20
few questions on the formulas in Venter's review of Brown's paper =
(i.e. the=20
first one on the syllabus). Does that seem reasonable ?=20
=20
Thanks,=20
=20
Meyer=20
=20
=20
------=_NextPart_000_009E_01BDAA8B.FDB64980
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
I doubt Venter's discussion will ever =be that=20critical. The equations are difficult to memorize and don't =necessarily=20add a lot of value with the increase in complexity.
-----Original Message----- =
To: studygroup9@lists.casact.org
Subject: =
I read the article in the order of the =syllabus, and it=20 suited me fine. As
far as=20 Venter, it's true that there has not been a lot of questions on =it.=20
You'd think that it =should come=20 soon, right?
Jean-Pierre
-----Original Message-----
From: meyer.shields@zurich.com=20 <meyer.shields@zurich.com>
To: studygroup9@lists.casact.org=20 <studygroup9@lists.casact.org>
Date: July 8, 1998 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: This Group =
order to go through the articles that is =better than the=20 order found in the
syllabus=20 itself.
Also, the=20 Murdza manual questions seem to imply that there have been =very=20
few questions on the =formulas in=20 Venter's review of Brown's paper (i.e. the
first one on the syllabus). Does that =seem=20 reasonable ?
Thanks,
Meyer