------_=_NextPart_001_01BE1D6E.D5D581A0
Content-Type: text/plain
Does anyone understand the different types of interest analysis well enough
to explain them better than Lorimer, or have examples that might clear them
up?
Rule of significant contacts: How do you decide which state better protects
its citizens? Which one allows the largest awards (most beneficial to the
injured)? The smallest (most beneficial to the defendent)? The example
given in the text wasn't very clear, because it still didn't say which state
would be used under each test or rule.
It seems the same questions would arise when using the Comparative
Impairment Test.
Is there any better order to read the articles in then what is listed in the
syllabus?
------_=_NextPart_001_01BE1D6E.D5D581A0
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
Does anyone understand the different =types of interest analysis well enough to explain them better than =Lorimer, or have examples that might clear them up?
Rule of significant contacts: =How do you decide which state better protects its citizens? Which =one allows the largest awards (most beneficial to the injured)? The =smallest (most beneficial to the defendent)? The example given in =the text wasn't very clear, because it still didn't say which state =would be used under each test or rule.
It seems the same questions would =arise when using the Comparative Impairment Test.
Is there any better order to read the =articles in then what is listed in the syllabus?