Dan Perry <dperry@unigard.com> on 11/19/98 11:05:42 AM
To: Ray DeJaco
cc: 'studygroup8' <studygroup8@lists.casact.org>
Subject: RE: Mintel Question
Ray, I found the following page references:
1. p. 133 (Mintel Chapter 8)
2. p. 115 (actually right above the paragraph dealing with the Shavers
case)
3. p. 131.
I hope this is helpful. Please let me know if you need clarification.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ray.DeJaco@jmagroup.com [mailto:Ray.DeJaco@jmagroup.com]
Sent: Monday, November 16, 1998 7:40 AM
To: Lou_Brown@ncci.com
Cc: studygroup8@lists.casact.org
Subject: Re:
I was looking over last years test. #19 is from Mintel. Apparently 1,2, &
3 are all true but I cant find the items in the reading. Can anyone else
pinpoint the page that these items are stated? In fact, wouldn't the
Shavers v. Kelley case discussed on page 115 contradict 2) being true
(courts have consistently upheld statutory rate standards regarding
insurance risk classifications, even though they are very general)
Lou_Brown@ncci.com on 11/12/98 09:01:16 AM
To: Kevin Weathers <kevweath@yahoo.com>
cc: studygroup8@lists.casact.org (bcc: Ray DeJaco)
Subject:
I guess I must be because I left the study group 9 list and joined the
study group 8 one. I hate preparing this early, especially before the
holidays, but part 8 is a killer.
Kevin Weathers <kevweath@yahoo.com> on 11/11/98 09:31:54 PM
To: Study Group <studygroup8@lists.casact.org>
cc: (bcc: Lou Brown/BOCA/NCCI)
Subject:
So is there anyone else out there trying to leave the fall exams
behind and look toward the future???
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com