Greene, Government Insurers

christine.fleming@milliman.com
Mon, 23 Mar 1998 13:49:58 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: dperry@UNIGARD.COM: "FW: Social Security question"
Next message: dperry@UNIGARD.COM: "FW: Greene, Government Insurers"

Greene says in one place that state property insurance is not needed,=20
that private can and does cover these losses=2E Then, at the end, he=20
lists state property insurance in the "is needed and works well"=20
category=2E Am I reading this right? Any ideas on this apparent=20
contradiction?

Previous message: dperry@UNIGARD.COM: "FW: Social Security question"
Next message: dperry@UNIGARD.COM: "FW: Greene, Government Insurers"