FW: Re Point distribution of Last Five E
dperry@UNIGARD.COM
Mon, 23 Mar 1998 7:42:36 -0800
Good observation by Eliza14. I should have spelled that out more clearly in=
=20
my release of the point distribution. Basically I took all points that were=
=20
asked off of an article, whether it was on 8 or another one (such as 3B).=20
This gives more ideas about old exam questions, since there are more points=
,=20
but it does not reflect accurately the point total for Part 8 alone. You ar=
e=20
absolutely right that the articles listed below are not the most important=20
on the syllabus. Anyway, sorry for the confusion.
----------
From: Eliza14@aol.com
To: studygroup8@lists.casact.org; Dan Perry
Subject: Re Point distribution of Last Five Exams
Date: Sunday, March 22, 1998 5:00AM
I don't see the same point distribution as the previous post on this topic.
Last year's test had 2 points on the WC/Chamber of Commerce reading, not=20
5.4.
Hamilton/Malecki had 1.5 points, not 4.5. (At first glance, the rest seem=20
OK.)
If the analysis was based on the CSM manuals, it's worth noting that Murdza
includes 3B questions in his Part 8 study kit.
The previous post makes it seem like Chamber of Commerce and=20
Hamilton/Malecki
are the most important papers on the syllabus. They aren't, and I'd hate to
see someone studying them as if they were.