I have also included the average over five years (or less, if we have less=20
than five data points), and totals of all readings. The reason the totals d=
o=20
not add up to 100 are that the point totals do not include current events,=20
and they also include some older readings which have since been eliminated.
I was not sure what kind of medium to send this in, so I am just including=20
it in this note. It may turn out ugly, depending on how e-mail gets sent to=
=20
everyone. Please let me know if you need me to resend it.
Reading 93 94 95 96 97 Average
Lorimer 8 0.40 4.40 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.26
Lorimer 10 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.20
Keeton 2.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00
NY ACLI 1.00 2.50 4.00 1.00 3.00 2.30
Hensler 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.60
Select Committee 0.00 4.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.60
O'Connell/Joost 4.00 2.50 5.50 3.00 2.00 3.40
AIA Auto 1.00 0.00 0.60 2.00 2.00 1.12
Chamber of Commerce 2.60 7.80 5.00 7.00 5.40 5.56
Hallman/Hamilton 0.00 0.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.20
Robertson B 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.60
Robertson C 7.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 4.00 3.00
Myers 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 1.20
Greene 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.20 3.00 2.24
Laval 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Hamilton IC 2.00 2.00
Musulin NA NA NA NA NA NA
ISO 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Brady 2 0.00 2.50 0.00 1.00 3.50 1.40
Brady 3 NA NA NA NA NA NA
Brady 4 2.00 2.00
Brady 6 1.00 1.00
Brady 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 2.00 0.44
Kimball/Heaney 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.20
CAS 3.00 3.00
Joskow CCR 3.00 2.50 2.00 2.60 1.60 2.34
Danzon 5.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.50 3.30
Krohm 2.00 2.00
Mintel 5 0.00 3.00 0.40 1.40 0.40 1.04
Mintel 7 0.00 0.00 0.20 1.20 2.20 0.72
Ettlinger 4 3.20 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.04
Mintel 1 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.60
Mintel 8 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.64
Mintel 10 0.00 3.00 4.00 1.00 1.50 1.90
Mintel 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 1.00 0.70
Mintel 13 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.75 0.00 0.75
NAIC CR 5.80 1.00 4.00 0.40 1.00 2.44
Feldblum 1.00 1.00 1.00
NY Law 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.20
Harrington/Doerpinghaus NA NA NA NA NA NA
Williams 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 3.20
Hamilton/Malecki 2.40 1.00 4.85 4.50 4.50 3.45
Lee 4.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Hamilton AA 1.00 1.00
Ghezzi 1.00 1.00
Ettlinger 6 0.00 0.00 1.50 2.00 0.00 0.70
Ettlinger 8 0.80 0.00 0.20 2.00 3.10 1.22
Wilcox NA NA NA NA NA NA
D'Arcy 0.00 2.00 3.00 1.50 1.50 1.60
Ludwig/McAuley 1.00 1.00 2.50 2.00 1.00 1.50
Troxel/Bouchie 4.00 1.00 2.50 2.00 4.00 2.70
Bouhan 2.50 2.50
Totals 64.20 59.20 66.25 70.25 93.40 70.66
The "blank" spaces indicate that the reading was not on the syllabus yet at=
=20
that point, whereas cells which have a zero in them mean that no points cam=
e=20
from that reading that year. I hope this is helpful to you overall.
On another subject, having spoke with some of you at the Ratemaking Seminar=
=20
in Chicago, it seems like the preferred mode of study for this exam overall=
=20
is by using 3x5 cards. I have been trying to think of a useful way to have=20=
a=20
"card exchange" of some kind. The idea that came to me was to have an=20
exchange of possible exam type questions from the new readings, since we do=
=20
not have any questions on these readings in the study manual. Does that=20
sound like a good idea to you? I thought it would be helpful, because it is=
=20
not always easy to determine what new material will be asked. Let me know=20
what you think.
Talk to you soon. Best of luck.