Schedule F
Jim Shoenfelt ( (no email) )
Sun, 25 Oct 1998 18:56:43 -0500
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Previous message: Giunta,Theresa: "RE: Bonds"
- Next message: Sce, Michael: "RE: Schedule F"
- Next in thread: weathek@towers.com: "Re: Schedule F"
- Maybe reply: weathek@towers.com: "Re: Schedule F"
- Maybe reply: Oswald, Apryle: "RE: Schedule F"
- Maybe reply: Rasa Varanka: "RE: Schedule F"
- Maybe reply: Giunta,Theresa: "RE: Schedule F"
- Maybe reply: Gardner, Brad: "RE: Schedule F"
- Maybe reply: Turner,Brian K.,PLG, New York: "RE: Schedule F"
- Maybe reply: Sce, Michael: "RE: Schedule F"
- Maybe reply: Sce, Michael: "RE: Schedule F"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_002D_01BE0049.35053960
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think Schedule F reading has a problem. Please let me know if I'm way =
off. In the last example (the last 3 pages), Feldblum calculates the =
slow-paying test-ratio using pt 3 and pt 4 data. But pt 3 and pt 4 data =
is supposed to included amounts in dispute but the slow-paying test =
ratio is not. Am I right in that the reading is boo-booed? If you get =
it, please correct me.
------=_NextPart_000_002D_01BE0049.35053960
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
I think Schedule F reading has a problem. Please let =me know=20if I'm way off. In the last example (the last 3 pages), Feldblum=20calculates the slow-paying test-ratio using pt 3 and pt 4 data. =But pt 3=20and pt 4 data is supposed to included amounts in dispute but the =slow-paying=20test ratio is not. Am I right in that the reading is =boo-booed? If=20you get it, please correct me.
------=_NextPart_000_002D_01BE0049.35053960--