Might be because the NEAS and the author are the same person.
- Shalom
Dont get discougaged, these new papers and "bad exam problems" are
obsticles to EVERYONE's study schedule.
Jeff
To: studygroup6
cc: (bcc: Jeff Courchene)
From: bgardner@scc.state.nm.us
Date: 02/09/98 07:09:19 PM
Subject:
I feel the same way! I just got through reading Feldblum's An Asset
Share Pricing Approach for the second time. Is this paper long enough?
Hell. they could have a 4 hour exam just over the footnotes!! I looked @
question #38 from the 1996 exam on this topic. This question was totally
left field from the paper I read. The NEAS criticized this problem and
said the examiner did not understand this new reading! This is one
problem we all face for the new syllabus readings, in addition to the
lack of past exam questions. Very frustrating!
As a side note, could someone please tell me what is the last page
number for the study note reading Experience Rating and Funding Methods
by Bluhm? My study note ends on page 36.