RE: Concatenator?

Janicke, Mike ( (no email) )
Wed, 21 Jul 1999 15:50:52 -0400

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01BED3B2.07F49924
Content-Type: text/plain

i believe the word is a fictitious name of a division....it's
irrelevant...the authors could have easily called it ABC business as opposed
to concatenator business.

mike janicke

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg.Babushkin@mail.state.ky.us
> [SMTP:Greg.Babushkin@mail.state.ky.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 10:25 AM
> To: studygroup5b@lists.casact.org
> Subject: Concatenator?
>
> What is concatenator mentioned in Ch 4.?
>
> Thanks
>
> Gregory S. Babushkin

------_=_NextPart_001_01BED3B2.07F49924
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
RE: Concatenator?

i believe the word =is a fictitious name of a division....it's irrelevant...the authors =could have easily called it ABC business as opposed to concatenator =business.

mike janicke


------_=_NextPart_001_01BED3B2.07F49924--