------_=_NextPart_001_01BE8C1B.8495E818
Content-Type: text/plain
Hi all,
Had a flashback from part 8 while reading NAIC chapter 22. I thought I post
a question. Not sure whether this is exam related or not. If not, I
apologize.
Many companies that went through a liability based restructuring had
reinsurance arrangement on their existing environmental liabilities.
According to NAIC chapter 22, any recoverable from reinsurer has to be
booked on gross basis for a retroactive reinsurance. The recoverable is
recognized in the write-in on page 4 while the gross losses flow through the
income statement. Hummm... Does that mean that the reinsurance arrangements
for a company after LBR will have no benefit to its Statutory income? In
other words, the company's statutory income will still recognize the adverse
loss development to its environmental liability on a gross basis but will
not recognize the reinsurance recoverable from those adverse development.
Is that true? Wouldn't that distort the actual income and even the IRIS
ratios?
Am I thinking this correctly?
---Yin
------_=_NextPart_001_01BE8C1B.8495E818
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
Hi all,
Had a flashback from part 8 =while reading NAIC chapter 22. I thought I post a question. =Not sure whether this is exam related or not. If not, I =apologize.
Many companies that went =through a liability based restructuring had reinsurance arrangement on =their existing environmental liabilities.
According to NAIC chapter =22, any recoverable from reinsurer has to be booked on gross =basis for a retroactive reinsurance. The recoverable is =recognized in the write-in on page 4 while the gross losses flow =through the income statement. Hummm... Does that mean that the =reinsurance arrangements for a company after LBR will have no benefit =to its Statutory income? In other words, the company's statutory =income will still recognize the adverse loss development to its =environmental liability on a gross basis but will not recognize the =reinsurance recoverable from those adverse development. Is that =true? Wouldn't that distort the actual income and even the IRIS =ratios?
Am I thinking this =correctly?
---Yin
------_=_NextPart_001_01BE8C1B.8495E818--