Daykin UW cycles

Chris Heim ( (no email) )
Thu, 11 Feb 1999 17:44:13 -0600

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01BE55E6.23B5AB20
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

It seems to me that there is an inconsistency in Daykin's views on the
underwriting cycle. Pages 26-27 of the Guided Tour state that "there is a
significant degree of synchronization between the cycles in different
countries." Pages 34-35 seem to imply the complete opposite in saying that
the cycles can "be expected to vary greatly between different countries."
Can anyone explain this logic?

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01BE55E6.23B5AB20
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">

It=20seems to me that there is an inconsistency in Daykin's views on the =underwriting=20cycle.  Pages 26-27 of the Guided Tour state that "there is a=20significant degree of synchronization between the cycles in different=20countries."  Pages 34-35 seem to imply the complete opposite =in saying=20that the cycles can "be expected to vary greatly between different=20countries."  Can anyone explain this=20logic?
------=_NextPart_000_0001_01BE55E6.23B5AB20--