What M-Squared does is it "allows investors to analyze a bunch of
disparate as if they had all shown the same volatility. It does that by
hypothetically blending shares of a volatile fund with cash" to match
the "S&P 500's volatility."
Now I have always been suspicious about many of the various methods of
finding risk-adjusted discount rates. I prefer observable rates. This
strikes me as being different in that the formula for determining this
seems explicit (I did not check any references, I just read the WSJ
article.), and the components are observable.
I would like to hear what others think of this approach. Would this
approach be superior to the various risk adjustments that we all know
and (perhaps) love?
Glenn Meyers
Insurance Services Office, Inc.
Internet: gmeyers@iso.com
Voice:(212) 898-5938
Fax: (212) 898-6060
Visit the CAS Web Site at http://www.casact.org
===============================================
To subscribe or unsubscribe from CASNET:
Send an e-mail to caslists@lists.casact.org
Type in the body join casnet to subscribe
or leave casnet to unsubscribe.