Brad Gile, FSA
----------
> From: Todd R. Bault <bault001@maroon.tc.umn.edu>
> To: 'casnet@lists.casact.org'
> Subject: FW: Statement of Opinion Question by "BRAD GILE"
<bgile@amfam.com>
> Date: Wednesday, April 08, 1998 9:07 AM
>
> While I agree that Blanchard's and Miller's replies reflect the "letter
of
> the law" and probably would be acceptable for an actuarial opinion, Gile
> points outs the counterintuitive nature of the result. Such an opinion
> would probably provoke a layperson to ask what good is an actuarial
opinion
> if it allows companies to be insolvent. I'm sure we could convince other
> actuaries that Blanchard and Miller are correct, but I don't think that
my
> mother would buy it.
>
> This is a good example of how actuaries probably need to be more
pro-active
> in keeping their profession relevant. While I certainly don't expect
> individual actuaries to go out on a limb and put themselves in jeopardy,
> this example indicates to me that we, as a profession, should be moving
> quickly towards opining on the entire balance sheet. If we are not
willing
> to do this, we could eventually be cut out of the process in favor of
those
> who are willing to take on this job.
>
> Todd Bault, FCAS
>
> The opinions expressed above are mine alone, and do not necessarily
reflect
> the views of other parties.
>
>
> Visit the CAS Web Site at http://www.casact.org
> ===============================================
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from CASNET:
> Send an e-mail to caslists@lists.casact.org
> Type in the body join casnet to subscribe
> or leave casnet to unsubscribe.
>
Visit the CAS Web Site at http://www.casact.org
===============================================
To subscribe or unsubscribe from CASNET:
Send an e-mail to caslists@lists.casact.org
Type in the body join casnet to subscribe
or leave casnet to unsubscribe.